Invention

Source Report

Part 1

In my senior year, I chose AP Psychology as an elective, and one topic that stuck with me was how we categorize mental illnesses. Our class was introduced to the DSM, or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which is the handbook used by doctors to diagnose mental health conditions. I knew it had evolved over time, but I was still shocked by some of the early definitions of common disorders—especially autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

In the first DSM, autism was only mentioned once, classified under “schizoid personality disorder” in children. The next edition grouped it similarly and suggested a potential link to mental retardation. Looking back at these early definitions, it’s clear how much our perception of ASD has shifted. What was once seen through a narrow, often stigmatized lens has now grown into a broader understanding that includes a range of behaviors, challenges, and strengths.

This evolution fascinates me, and I want to explore it further—understanding not just how our view of ASD has changed but also what sparked that change. Was it scientific research? Shifting social attitudes? I think looking into these questions could reveal a lot about the progress in psychology and the importance of challenging outdated perspectives. This may also reveal some flaws that still exist in our current versions of the DSM. While it’s hard to be perfect, how are the classifications made on mental disorders harmful, especially when they are inaccurate?

Part 2 Draft

Part 2 Final Draft

Part 3

Final Presentation